The Memory Safeguard Institutional Charter

Preserving Human-Authored Memory in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Purpose

The Memory Safeguard Institutional Charter establishes shared principles for the responsible preservation of human-authored memory as artificial intelligence systems increasingly generate, transform, and abstract information at scale.

This Charter affirms that human memory—imperfect, contextual, and lived—constitutes a foundational record of culture, identity, and decision-making, and requires deliberate stewardship to ensure its integrity over time.

Scope

This Charter applies to institutions, organizations, and initiatives engaged in:

  • Archival preservation

  • Cultural heritage stewardship

  • Research and education

  • Ethical technology governance

  • Long-term knowledge preservation

Endorsement of this Charter does not require alignment with any specific technological, political, or philosophical position.

Charter Principles

1. Memory as Infrastructure

We recognize human-authored memory as a form of civilizational infrastructure that supports accountability, continuity, and cultural understanding.

Preservation systems shall prioritize durability, neutrality, and long-term stewardship over optimization or commercial objectives.

 

2. Human Authorship and Provenance

We commit to preserving clear provenance for human-authored memory, including authorship, time of creation, and conditions of origin.

Memory records shall distinguish original human expression from later interpretation, synthesis, or transformation.

 

3. Layered Preservation

We support preservation models that maintain separation between:

  • Primary human expression

  • Contextual metadata

  • Interpretive or reflective layers

No interpretive process shall replace or overwrite original human-authored records.

 

4. Non-Optimization of Memory

We affirm that human memory shall not be optimized for engagement, efficiency, or algorithmic preference.

Ambiguity, contradiction, and emotional variance are intrinsic to human experience and shall be preserved accordingly.

 

5. Temporal Integrity

We commit to maintaining the temporal context of preserved memory.

Subsequent reinterpretations shall be recorded as distinct artifacts, ensuring that change over time remains visible rather than collapsed into artificial coherence.

 

6. Consent and Stewardship

We uphold the principle that memory preservation requires informed consent and responsible stewardship.

Individuals retain the right to define access conditions, posthumous use, and restrictions on preserved memory.

 

7. Proportional Preservation

We recognize that meaningful preservation does not require total capture.

Preservation efforts should prioritize significance, reflection, and cultural value while avoiding surveillance-based or exhaustive recording practices.

 

8. Institutional Neutrality and Openness

We support open, auditable standards that enable institutional adoption without dependence on a single authority or proprietary system.

Participation in Memory Safeguard initiatives shall remain voluntary and non-exclusive.

 

9. Continuity and Dormancy

We acknowledge that preservation initiatives must endure periods of limited attention or use.

Systems should be designed for long-term continuity independent of trends, funding cycles, or immediate engagement.

 

10. Responsibility to the Future

We affirm that preserved human memory serves future generations by enabling accountability, historical understanding, and differentiation between lived experience and machine-derived inference.

 

Endorsement

By endorsing this Charter, an institution affirms its commitment to responsible stewardship of human-authored memory while retaining autonomy over implementation, governance, and scope.

 

Closing Statement

The Memory Safeguard Institutional Charter exists to ensure that as intelligence systems evolve, the record of human experience remains authentic, distinguishable, and accessible to those who come after us.



“The Institutional Charter defines our commitments; the Doctrine explains the reasoning behind them.”